Selected Switzerland. Map lens AI conditions, value 95, Stronger conditions.

humAIne intelligence · Global AI Atlas

What should this country ask
before it trusts AI with real lives?

Reading the atlas: the context map is a directional model. Adoption estimates and surveys are shown separately in each country profile, with their actual dates. Judgement stays human.

Country context, AI adoption and social impact in one atlas. Explore the conditions for useful AI alongside evidence about how people and organisations use it.

Search a country for its opportunities, adoption estimates and social-use surveys. Compare like-for-like measures, inspect the original sources and explore economic studies. Each measure keeps its own population and observation period.

Quarterly from 1 October 2026: 1 January, 1 April, 1 July and 1 October at 08:00 Europe/Zurich.

Read the method

Selected

Switzerland

AI conditions: 95 · Stronger conditions

Scale with safeguards

Vulnerable work

9.6%

Unemployment

4.9%

Inflation

0.1%

Countries first

Search and select below. The map is secondary on small screens.

AI conditions

Access, skills, public capacity and resource room

LowerHigher

Directional model. Country comparison guides questions; it does not replace local diagnosis.

Selected country indicators and lens values
IndicatorValueYear
AI conditions95Stronger conditions
Vulnerable work9.6%2025
Unemployment4.9%2025
Inflation0.1%2025
Internet use97%2025
Electricity access100%2024
Secondary completion96%2024
Life expectancy84.4 years2024
Population 65+20%2025
Water stress6.5%2022
Public capacity87 / 1002024

Vulnerable work

9.6%

Observation 2025

Unemployment

4.9%

Observation 2025

Inflation

0.1%

Observation 2025

Internet use

97%

Observation 2025

Electricity access

100%

Observation 2024

The FII survey covers 60,000 people in 32 countries, not every country on this map. Regional worry patterns therefore act as a starting lens. Country indicators adjust the analysis and every panel shows where evidence is thin. One human remains responsible for judgement; this is a research tool under Intelligence, not a firm mandate.

217Country context profiles
14Comparable indicators
—Adoption & social profiles
4×Reviews per year

Global AI Atlas / Evidence edition loading

Country context checked 2026-09-01. Loading the adoption and social evidence edition…

Countries and economies follow source reporting conventions; boundaries and listings imply no position on sovereignty. Missing polygons remain accessible through country search and the table. AI estimates, surveys and studies are separate evidence. No universal impact score is calculated.
Eurostat data selected and reformatted by humAIne with attribution. Microsoft data © 2026 Microsoft, reused under the MIT License. Interpretation is humAIne’s responsibility.

Seven regional questions

A shared technology.
Different questions.

The regional layer comes from the worry patterns in the FII Priority Compass and is refined with country indicators. It frames inquiry, not a playbook. Every country still needs local evidence and public participation — and judgement stays with a named human.

Method and limits

Evidence first.
Judgement stays human.

The atlas is a decision aid for asking better questions. It does not forecast national outcomes, replace local diagnosis, or recommend automated decisions about people.

Regional worry lens

FII Priority Compass 2025 establishes the public concern pattern. Its 32-country sample supports regional context, not direct claims about every country.

Country evidence

Fourteen World Bank series add labour, prices, access, health, education, demographics, water and public-capacity signals. Each panel keeps the observation year.

Directional model

Human pressure combines measured constraints. Deployment conditions combine access, skills, public capacity and resource room. The bridge lens joins the two.

Rights boundary

UNESCO principles guide the guardrails: proportionality, privacy, auditability, transparency, human responsibility and routes to challenge decisions.

See the model formula and coverage limits

Human pressure

Available signals include vulnerable work, unemployment, inflation, internet and electricity gaps, life expectancy, secondary completion, water stress and government effectiveness. Current FCV classifications add a conflict and fragility signal.

Deployment conditions

Access averages internet and electricity. Skills use lower-secondary completion. Public capacity uses the revised World Bank score. Resource room uses GDP per person at purchasing-power parity on a log scale.

Bridge gap

The bridge lens weights human pressure at 62% and the inverse of deployment conditions at 38%. Missing observations are omitted or replaced by a stated fallback. Bands reduce false precision.